netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization

To: "Atul Sabharwal" <iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:59:24 -0700
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <009201c56280$e9b7cd00$0202a8c0@ATULSPC>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20050526110425.27590eb8@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050526.144638.71091166.davem@davemloft.net> <20050526154857.3cb34d11@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050526.155401.18310361.davem@davemloft.net> <009201c56280$e9b7cd00$0202a8c0@ATULSPC>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 26 May 2005 22:57:05 -0700
"Atul Sabharwal" <iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have a question about using the 802.1d driver with a switch.  I have a 
> managed switch
> which connects to the Xscale MAC using a Reverse MII interface.
> 
> It seems that the 802.1d bridge puts the interface into promiscuous mode and 
> needs multiple
> ethernet devices to work with.  Can it work with a single ethernet device 
> which is connected
> to a BCM5338 ( broadcomm 8 port switch chip ).

Why? what would you gain?

> I understand that I would have to change the STP configuration component to 
> write to the
> broadcomm chip.

You would be better off writing a different driver, the amount of shared
logic would be less than the per hardware logic. 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>