netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [4/6] ipw2100: fix after "ieee80211_device alignment fix"

To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [4/6] ipw2100: fix after "ieee80211_device alignment fix"
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:58:20 +0200
Cc: NetDev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050524151802.59124dde@griffin.suse.cz>
References: <20050524150711.01632672@griffin.suse.cz> <20050524151802.59124dde@griffin.suse.cz>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Út 24-05-05 15:18:02, Jiri Benc wrote:
> Fixes ipw2100 after ieee80211_device alignment fix
> (patch [2/5] ieee80211: ieee80211_device alignment fix and cleanup)
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jirka Bohac <jbohac@xxxxxxx>
> 
> --- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3.01/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c    2005-05-19 
> 16:23:00.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3.04/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c    2005-05-19 
> 17:35:48.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@
>  /* Called by register_netdev() */
>  static int ipw2100_net_init(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> -     struct ipw2100_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
> +     struct ipw2100_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(netdev_priv(dev));
>       return ipw2100_up(priv, 1);
>  }


Ugh, that is getting rather ugly. Perhaps inline function doing this
should be introduced?

                                                                Pavel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>