| To: | Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [XFRM] Call dst_check() with appropriate cookie |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 May 2005 22:50:28 +1000 |
| Cc: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050524083419.GA31586@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <E1DaTeW-00085B-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <4292E53D.7030805@miyazawa.org> <20050524083419.GA31586@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:34:19PM +1000, herbert wrote: > > Yes this makes perfect sense. However, I'd still like to know why I > have never seen it myself. Let me double-check my test setup. Aha, not all IPv6 dst entries have obsolete set to -1. Obviously your ones were and mine weren't :) -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ieee80211.h and DSSS PHY type, Mateusz Berezecki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [XFRM] Call dst_check() with appropriate cookie, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Call dst_check() with appropriate cookie, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Call dst_check() with appropriate cookie, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |