netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] bonding using arp_ip_target may stay down with active path

To: eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding using arp_ip_target may stay down with active path
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: fubar@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1116959462.8954.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <200505232121.j4NLLaYa000837@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <1116959200.8954.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1116959462.8954.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:31:02 -0400

> It ate my tabs again.  This mailer is going out the window.

This is why I personally stick to Emacs/MEW and Sylpheed.

I tried Evolution for a while long ago, but stopped the first
time it refused to read in my entire mbox because it failed to
parse a multi-byte character in _one_ of the emails contained
within.

I'm sure that's fixed, but it's very much a non-ascii-text
mailer by default, so you have to pluck with it's configuration
a little bit if you're sending patches and code around a lot.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>