| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sendmsg ignoring bind? |
| From: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2005 15:31:44 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050520132429.GA32695@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <20050520081805.GR25658@wiggy.net> <20050520101749.GA8661@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050520132009.GD4151@wiggy.net> <20050520132429.GA32695@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Previously Herbert Xu wrote:
> I suppose we can expect to have this in a future release of strace :)
It just might happen :)
> > cmsg_type=IP_PKTINFO,
> > {ifindex=0,ipi_spec_dst=inet_addr("0.0.0.0"),ipi_addr=("0.0.0.0")}},
> > msg_flags=0},
>
> This is far from useless. This will set the source address back to zero
> which essentially means that the bound address is ignored.
I can see it being useful, except in my case it is somewhat unexpected
and undesirable behaviour. I'll make sure to have that fixed in
FreeRADIUS though.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sendmsg ignoring bind?, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sendmsg ignoring bind?, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] dummy: improve performance, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |