| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones |
| From: | Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 15:20:44 -0500 |
| Cc: | util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050519.122127.74747706.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | IBM |
| References: | <200505191106.53136.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <20050519190032.GA19620@us.ibm.com> <20050519.122127.74747706.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
On Thursday 19 May 2005 02:21 pm, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:00:32 -0500 > > > I combined my previous patch with your patch, and came up with the > > following. I have tested it on my system, and it works exactly the way > > I wanted. What do you think? > > Look, let's do this. Do an initial patch that only does > enables features possible on all devices. Because we > all agree that is a definite improvement from the current > situation. > > Then we can discuss the relative merits of enabling features > available on only some devices. > > Ok? That is acceptable to me. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] netlink: defer socket destruction a bit, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Ethernet Bridging: Enable Hardware Checksumming, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |