| To: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 00:08:09 -0700 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1116486385.21310.82.camel@uganda> |
| References: | <20050518202458.55a63d37.akpm@osdl.org> <E1DYcyg-0005fP-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20050518222729.007887b8.akpm@osdl.org> <1116484313.21310.78.camel@uganda> <20050518234552.4aef6d02.akpm@osdl.org> <1116486385.21310.82.camel@uganda> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is there any reason for being able to do that? > > It was created to be able to load several different connector devices > from different modules [basically it was module1.ko unit=10, module2.ko > unit=11 and so on]. Loading multiple instances of the same module so that we get multiple instances of its data structures? That's fairly ghastly. We should remove the feature. If there is demonstrated need for multiple instances then it should be done by more conventional means - syscall, allocation of a device major then use the minor as a selector or whatever. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |