| To: | leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 18:28:21 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505200125.j4K1PaVG015780@guinness.s2io.com> |
| References: | <20050519.175542.07642115.davem@davemloft.net> <200505200125.j4K1PaVG015780@guinness.s2io.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:25:35 -0700 > Yes, I think I'm actually with you. As long as each page is physically > continuous and therefore requires one descriptor per page, the total > number of descriptors per packet will be only 64K / PAGE_SIZE (plus > some for headers), and this is fully manageable from a NIC > prospective. Yes, that is exactly what happens. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [PATCH] Super TSO, Leonid Grossman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip), Kosta Todorovic |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [PATCH] Super TSO, Leonid Grossman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO, Rick Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |