| To: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 11:52:58 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <428CB7DC.1050206@us.ibm.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505191654400.24043@webhosting.rdsbv.ro> <428CB7DC.1050206@us.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:59:24 -0700 > While this is generally a cleaner thing to do - it breaks > what we need - Jon's patch adds the checksum offload/SG > unconditionally precisely because we don't want it to be > an all or nothing - we'd like to utilize offload on those > devices that do support it.. No, I think Catalin's patch is exactly how this should be implemented. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Ethernet Bridging: Enable Hardware Checksumming, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones (was Ethernet Bridging: Enable Hardware Checksumming), Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [BRIDGE] Set features based on slave's ones (was Ethernet Bridging: Enable Hardware Checksumming), Jon Mason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |