| To: | akpm@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050518234552.4aef6d02.akpm@osdl.org> |
| References: | <20050518222729.007887b8.akpm@osdl.org> <1116484313.21310.78.camel@uganda> <20050518234552.4aef6d02.akpm@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:45:52 -0700 > > Should I ask David Miller to allocate new one specially for connector? > > Dave? Giving the connector a single value 10 is OK, the rest of what the connector is doing in this area is not. I wish you hadn't put the connector into -mm, it's really in need of several fixups still. The bogus reuse of the ULOG netlink number is simply indicative of that. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |