Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly

[Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>]

* Herbert Xu <20050518015213.GB28070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-18 11:52
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:37:12AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > 
> > OK, I initially thought you would head for a much larger
> > threshold. Not sure if 30000 is large enough for a full
> > scale NFS server though ;-> You conviced me that my idea
> 
> I think it's big enough.  If it isn't it means that somebody
> has reordered the packets by 30000 which I find hard to
> believe :)

I was thinking about some kind of nfs server with huge recv
buffers and increased limits receiving at 50kpps experiencing
a delayed fragment once in a while. Definitely a rare case
but not impossible ;->