| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 May 2005 23:13:01 +0200 |
| Date: | Tue, 17 May 2005 23:13:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, akepner@xxxxxxx, jheffner@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050517.140245.71090021.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <m1k6lx7gkf.fsf@muc.de> <20050517.132202.59028935.davem@davemloft.net> <20050517202730.GA79960@muc.de> <20050517.140245.71090021.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:02:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> > Date: 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200 > > > But it's not clear such a hack would be worth it anyways. > > If anything it would be probably better to let mountd set the RTTs, e.g. > > implicitely with MSG_CONFIRM (I hope it is using it these days ...) > > I think we should implement a solution that goes beyond > the confines of NFS. Nothing in MSG_CONFIRM is NFS specific. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/12] orinoco: monitor mode support, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |