| To: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-) |
| From: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 May 2005 11:36:56 +0300 |
| Cc: | jbohac@xxxxxxx, jbenc@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050512225026.GA2822@elf.ucw.cz> |
| References: | <20050512225026.GA2822@elf.ucw.cz> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
On Friday 13 May 2005 01:50, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it > actually works. Since you apparently have this hardware, I'm going to hijack your attention for a second for the benefit of wireless crowd. How good it it? Signal strength/sensitivity? Does driver/fw/hw survive prolonged packet flood testing? I'm asking because so far I never saw 11g hw which does. I tried prism54 and acx111. Is ipw2000 worth buying? -- vda |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), Pavel Machek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), Pavel Machek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |