| To: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-) |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 May 2005 11:41:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jbohac@xxxxxxx, jbenc@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505131136.56641.vda@ilport.com.ua> |
| References: | <20050512225026.GA2822@elf.ucw.cz> <200505131136.56641.vda@ilport.com.ua> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi!
> > There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it
> > actually works.
>
> Since you apparently have this hardware,
> I'm going to hijack your attention for a second
> for the benefit of wireless crowd.
>
> How good it it? Signal strength/sensitivity?
No idea, flat I live in is so small I can get away with connecting
using bluetooth.
> Does driver/fw/hw survive prolonged packet flood testing?
> I'm asking because so far I never saw 11g hw which does.
> I tried prism54 and acx111. Is ipw2000 worth buying?
I'm not sure if ipw2100 supports 802.11g....
Pavel
--
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), Denis Vlasenko |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), John M Flinchbaugh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), Denis Vlasenko |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-), John M Flinchbaugh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |