| To: | Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: oops in ip_rcv |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 May 2005 11:26:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050505130904.GA16593@krispykreme> |
| References: | <20050505101542.GB7916@krispykreme> <E1DTeis-0005gu-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20050505130904.GA16593@krispykreme> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 5 May 2005 23:09:04 +1000
Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Any idea why you'd be receiving packets this early?
>
> Not sure, although PCI has already been probed and tcp_init is called
> with interrupts on. Any reason we cant take a packet at this point?
>
> Im guessing its calling this:
>
> IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_INRECEIVES);
>
> Which we dont initialise until later on in init_ipv4_mibs.
Can you test out putting the init_ipv4_mibs() call right before
the comment:
/*
* Add all the base protocols.
*/
If it fixes things for you I'll put that upstream.
Thanks.
I still would really like to know how you are getting packets
at all that early. Even if PCI is initialized, no interfaces
should be marked up at _all_.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ip route del bug?, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Peter Buckingham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: oops in ip_rcv, Anton Blanchard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: oops in ip_rcv, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |