| To: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] cleanups in drivers/net/wan/ - kfree of NULL pointer is valid |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 14:32:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | juhl-lkml@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, reginak@xxxxxxxxxxxx, pc300@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ncorbic@xxxxxxxxxxx, eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050428222330.GI26945@conectiva.com.br> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504290009310.2476@dragon.hyggekrogen.localhost> <20050428222330.GI26945@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:23:30 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Jesper Juhl escreveu: > > kfree(0) is perfectly valid, checking pointers for NULL before calling > > kfree() on them is redundant. The patch below cleans away a few such > > redundant checks (and while I was around some of those bits I couldn't > > stop myself from making a few tiny whitespace changes as well). > > > Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de MElo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thanks everyone. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add more explanation to tcp_prequeue comment, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Add more explanation to tcp_prequeue comment, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] optimize check in port-allocation code, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |