netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:25:15 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050501184731.GJ577@postel.suug.ch>
References: <20050501184731.GJ577@postel.suug.ch>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Sun, 1 May 2005 20:47:31 +0200
Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Makes the type > XFRM_MSG_MAX check behave correctly to
> protect access to xfrm_dispatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks Thomas.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Fw: [Bug 4554] New: /proc/net/route missing info for 127.0.0.1/8, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 2/2] [XFRM] Cleanup xfrm_msg_min and xfrm_dispatch, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch, Thomas Graf
Next by Thread:  [PATCH 2/2] [XFRM] Cleanup xfrm_msg_min and xfrm_dispatch, Thomas Graf
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]