| To: | Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec performance |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 12:27:44 -0700 |
| Cc: | miika@xxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1115148461.31573.9.camel@dillow.idleaire.com> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022117190.25766@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022204090.25766@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505030248020.26815@kaber.coreworks.de> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030820160.24686@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <1115099678.2953.3.camel@ori.thedillows.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030943310.247@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <1115129839.2953.4.camel@ori.thedillows.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505031913020.9502@kekkonen.cs.hut.fi> <1115148461.31573.9.camel@dillow.idleaire.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 03 May 2005 15:27:41 -0400 Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think it's been mentioned that our 3DES implementation has not been > tuned for x86, so there's probably some performance being left on the > floor. That's right. We only have an optimized AES implementation in assembler, and that's for i386 and x86_64 platforms only. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPsec performance, Dave Dillow |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, Dave Dillow |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |