| To: | Ramkrishna Vepa <ram.vepa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] s2io: replace readq() with mmiowb() in s2io_xmit() |
| From: | Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 13:06:20 +1000 |
| Cc: | "'Arthur Kepner'" <akepner@xxxxxxx>, "'Leonid Grossman'" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, muhammad.shafiq@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ramkrishna.vepa@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "'Ravinandan Arakali'" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <03d401c54f8c$03917fd0$5c10100a@pc.s2io.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505021844480.16692@linux.site> <03d401c54f8c$03917fd0$5c10100a@pc.s2io.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
> [Ram] Yes, it is to ensure ordering as well as the flush of the io that is > required in some platforms. If the flush of the IO is required I cant see how we can remove the read. Anton |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] s2io: replace readq() with mmiowb() in s2io_xmit(), Anton Blanchard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [PATCH] s2io: replace readq() with mmiowb() in s2io_xmit(), Ramkrishna Vepa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s2io: replace readq() with mmiowb() in s2io_xmit(), Arthur Kepner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |