| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | why memory is wasted in skbuff for received packet skb_alloc? |
| From: | linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2005 04:27:10 -0700 (PDT) |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=WDS8fdLTivlu9zq+Af8rcw8bFsOBmhtovr4vhPfEa6Icl6ViP9lsj7csfA82exmYvhzDxlFXk61UdYvrIH9BIKjPtXjQSUwcHvkKcesXDQlj374sJqGZQ1rPPqV35UazwHcyTxE1uh/BZyo9H8AD0dUXmY84yHVbm33HICMt2sI= ; |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
hello,
In kernel 2.4.30 i observe that when my
ethernet card received packet and uses alloc_skb its
not placing all pointers skb->data,skb->head,skb->tail
to same starting location instead i found it places
skb->data and skb->tail have 10 locations more than
skb->head.
For what purpose this 10 bytes are reserved
in skbuff also i am not able to see that skb_reserve
as theres no call to skb_reserve and i am printing
skbuff pointer values just after it gets allocated by
alloc_skb.
Thanks in advance,
linux_lover
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm1, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Store idev entries (was: [PATCH][IPv6][IPsec] stop infinite loop), Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm1, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | [-mm patch] SIS900 must select MII, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |