| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: policy update by id |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:43:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050428020754.GA23326@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <1114602874.7670.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114604657.7670.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114604826.7670.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050427233924.GA22238@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114650816.7663.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428012135.GA22950@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050428013014.GA23043@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114653140.7663.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428020754.GA23326@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:07:54 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You know what, I actually agree with you :) But you'll need to convince > Dave: > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/net/0305.3/0018.html I'm willing to reneg on that position if you can convince me that security minded folks won't be surprised by this pseudo- aliasing. For example, do firewall systems tend to support such priority schemes? If so, I guess we can do it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch2: del/get byid, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch2: del/get byid, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch: policy update by id, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch: policy update by id, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |