netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.

To: johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:30:23 +0400
Cc: dtor_core@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Jay Lan <jlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050426202437.234e7d45@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru>
Organization: MIPT
References: <20050411125932.GA19538@uganda.factory.vocord.ru> <d120d5000504260857cb5f99e@mail.gmail.com> <20050426202437.234e7d45@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru>
Reply-to: johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:24:37 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:57:55 -0500
> Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Evgeniy,
> > 
> > On 4/11/05, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > /*****************************************/
> > > Kernel Connector.
> > > /*****************************************/
> > ...
> > > +static int cn_call_callback(struct cn_msg *msg, void (*destruct_data) 
> > > (void *), void *data)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct cn_callback_entry *__cbq;
> > > +       struct cn_dev *dev = &cdev;
> > > +       int found = 0;
> > > +
> > > +       spin_lock_bh(&dev->cbdev->queue_lock);
> > > +       list_for_each_entry(__cbq, &dev->cbdev->queue_list, 
> > > callback_entry) {
> > > +               if (cn_cb_equal(&__cbq->cb->id, &msg->id)) {
> > > +                       __cbq->cb->priv = msg;
> > > +
> > > +                       __cbq->ddata = data;
> > > +                       __cbq->destruct_data = destruct_data;
> > > +
> > > +                       queue_work(dev->cbdev->cn_queue, &__cbq->work);
> > 
> > It looks like there is a problem with the code. As far as I can see
> > there is only one cn_callback_entry associated with each callback. So,
> > if someone sends netlink messages with the same id at a high enough
> > rate (so cbdev's work queue does not get a chance to get scheduled and
> > process pending requests) ddata and the destructor will be overwritten
> > which can lead to memory leaks and non-delivery of some messages.
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> 
> Connector needs to check return value here - zero means 
> that work was already queued and we must free shared skb.
> 
> There may not be the same work with different data.

Here is the patch:

* looking for johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/connector--main--0--patch-52 to compare 
with
* comparing to johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/connector--main--0--patch-52
M  connector.c

* modified files

--- orig/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ mod/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@
                        __cbq->ddata = data;
                        __cbq->destruct_data = destruct_data;
 
-                       queue_work(dev->cbdev->cn_queue, &__cbq->work);
-                       found = 1;
+                       if (queue_work(dev->cbdev->cn_queue, &__cbq->work))
+                               found = 1;
                        break;
                }
        }





        Evgeniy Polyakov

Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>