| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | understandable skbuff behavioural problem |
| From: | linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:42:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=yg53Ks+EPA9yTlTLkr+n7dzAW2uXVQaFRH6LszbUbpsLnDbCOoRCLwvUrgXKWWekyb8G1QE77fAirSlaNPqr8ZGkiL+lLjyAC21P+m8rPo6RVy4X0gbBAJ0Hi1NreyFyUdxatVLl2KbEpNU2++4rxRLDF3b/oRjzoBXV5WipzzI= ; |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
I am learning the skbuff workings in kenrel for
that I added a fake header in TCP/IP with Fake header
containing 2 fields of type int ipchksum and tcpchksum
taken frpm upper layer and only copied to new header.
I directly push it after IP header is added and thus
sending packets to destination pc. At destination side
i am able to receive application data(payload) indeed
correctly in FTP transfer but how to display those 2
fields in kernel using printk?
I am really stuck at this point please help me.
Thanks in advance.
regards,
linux_lover
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] netpoll: fix ->poll() locking, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH][SCTP] Use ipv6_addr_any rather than ipv6_addr_type in sctp_v6_is_any()., Sridhar Samudrala |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 11/16] e1000:Removed redundant statement in e1000_clean_tx_irq, Malli Chilakala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |