| To: | Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] netpoll: fix ->poll() locking |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:12:57 -0700 |
| Cc: | jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050423021440.GZ21897@waste.org> |
| References: | <4.454130102@selenic.com> <5.454130102@selenic.com> <17001.31150.194263.732284@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <20050422155218.223fa84d.davem@davemloft.net> <17001.33427.462497.856777@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <20050422155958.474a150c.davem@davemloft.net> <20050423021440.GZ21897@waste.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:14:40 -0700 Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In such a configuration, how did the netpoll code "tell" who the > > receive packets were for or did it send them to all registered > > netpoll clients for that device? > > It walked a global list of clients. Ok, we definitely need to fix this. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | understandable skbuff behavioural problem, linux lover |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 11/16] e1000:Removed redundant statement in e1000_clean_tx_irq, Malli Chilakala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/7] netpoll: fix ->poll() locking, Matt Mackall |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH][SCTP] Use ipv6_addr_any rather than ipv6_addr_type in sctp_v6_is_any()., Sridhar Samudrala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |