| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] QoS: frg queue (was [RFC] QoS: new per flow queue) |
| From: | Wang Jian <lark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:04:38 +0800 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050422111100.GN577@postel.suug.ch> |
| References: | <20050422115230.03E0.LARK@linux.net.cn> <20050422111100.GN577@postel.suug.ch> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Thomas Graf, On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:11:00 +0200, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I had another look at your code and noticed the GFP_KERNEL masked > kmalloc call in perflow_new_flow() called from perflow_enqueue(), > you must change that to GFP_ATOMIC due to softirq context. Acked. I will prepare another patch and put it online later. -- lark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC INTRO 0/5] H-TCP congestion control, Baruch Even |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem with IPSEC tunnel mode, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] QoS: frg queue (was [RFC] QoS: new per flow queue), Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] QoS: frg queue (was [RFC] QoS: new per flow queue), Wang Jian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |