netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem

from [Andi Kleen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: 22 Apr 2005 19:22:10 +0200
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:22:10 +0200
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx>, Arthur Kepner <akepner@xxxxxxx>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1114184245.7978.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03A633C7@orsmsx408> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180943290.15052@linux.site> <1113855967.7436.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050419055535.GA12211@sgi.com> <m1hdhzyrdz.fsf@muc.de> <17001.4034.250460.397016@robur.slu.se> <1114184245.7978.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i 
> Note, this would entirely solve what Andi and the SGI people are talking
> about.

Perhaps, but Linux has to perform well on old hardware too.
New silicon is not a solution.

-Andi
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, Andi Kleen
Next by Date:  Patch for USR r8169 clone, Ruud Linders
Previous by Thread:  Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, jamal
Next by Thread:  Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?, Park Lee
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]