netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BUG: HTB?

To: Asim Shankar <asimshankar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BUG: HTB?
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:56:05 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7bca1cb50504211221655fd54c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7bca1cb50504211221655fd54c@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

* Asim Shankar <7bca1cb50504211221655fd54c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-04-21 14:21
> Specifically, in the lines:
> if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
>         /* enqueue to helper queue */
>         if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
>                 __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
>                 q->direct_pkts++;
>         }
> }
> 
> If a packet is classified as HTB_DIRECT but the direct_queue is
> already full, then the packet doesn't get enqueued but sch->q.qlen++
> will happen a few lines later. Overflowing of the direct_queue
> probably rarely happens in practice, but I was playing around and
> noticed it happen in some corner cases of my testing.

Yes, that's a bug.

> Should the packet be dropped instead? Like:
> 
> if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
>         /* enqueue to helper queue */
>         if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
>                 __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
>                 q->direct_pkts++;
>         } else {
>                sch->qstats.drops++;
>                 kfree_skb(skb);
>                 return NET_XMIT_DROP;
>        }
> }

Can you send a patch? 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>