| To: | Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:36:35 +1000 |
| Cc: | Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1113062579.3893.110.camel@beastie> |
| References: | <20050406212906.GA24775@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112823442.16753.68.camel@beastie> <20050406220417.GA4443@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112826385.16753.99.camel@beastie> <20050407213231.GA28738@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112917001.3893.77.camel@beastie> <20050408113654.GA26095@gondor.apana.org.au> <1112974214.17165.8.camel@mylaptop> <20050409014447.GA22607@gondor.apana.org.au> <1113062579.3893.110.camel@beastie> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:02:59AM -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote: > > "emergency pool" is a big and generic feature, needs design and > resolution. it could definitely wait. Do you have something against > one liner patch for using sk->sk_allocation instead of hard-coded vm > priority? Whatever we come up with will need to be maintained as part of the kernel ABI. So I'd rather not see a temporary hack carried around forever. You can always patch your kernels to do whatever you want of course. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2/4] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2/4] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NETLINK_UESTABLISHED notifier event, Dmitry Yusupov |
| Next by Thread: | [IPv6] policy routing ?, Didier Barvaux |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |