| To: | Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:31:21 -0700 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42557895.8040004@ev-en.org> |
| References: | <20050407164146.GA6479@ev-en.org> <20050407101653.2cc68db1@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <42557895.8040004@ev-en.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:14:45 +0100 Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Going back to the pre-westwood code in BK, the /2 is still there. > > This wasn't there in 2.4.23 on which on the original work of H-TCP was > done. Not true, that division by 2 is in the 2.4.23 sources, I just checked. It is there as far back as BK logs go in both the 2.4.x and 2.6.x trees. Perhaps the WEB100 guys patched that test, I bet that's why you don't remember it being in 2.4.23 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff, Baruch Even |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff, Baruch Even |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff, John Heffner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |