[PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls

netdev

[PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function

To:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function
From:	Wang Jian <lark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:35:02 +0800
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

This is a simple patch against net/sched/cls_fw.c. The idea of this
patch is discussed in this thread

https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-March/018762.html

I chose 509 for FW_FILTER_HSIZE. If you feel it is waste of memory, then
251 is good too.

BTW: I don't know much about hash performance and hash distribution of
jhash. This is a quick fix.



-- 
  lark

hash-cls_fw.diff
Description: Binary data

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian <= Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, jamal Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Thomas Graf Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Thomas Graf Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Thomas Graf Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, jamal

Previous by Date:	Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS, James Morris
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Netlink Connector / CBUS, James Morris
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]