| To: | Wang Jian <lark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:37:44 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050405133336.0247.LARK@linux.net.cn> |
| References: | <20050405133336.0247.LARK@linux.net.cn> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:35:02 +0800 Wang Jian <lark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2005-March/018762.html > > I chose 509 for FW_FILTER_HSIZE. If you feel it is waste of memory, then > 251 is good too. Please us a power of two, the "%" is expensive on some cpus. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function, Wang Jian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |