| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy() |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:06:03 +1000 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504040544010.19728@kaber.coreworks.de> |
| References: | <4250160D.2040405@trash.net> <20050404012040.GA16960@gondor.apana.org.au> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504040544010.19728@kaber.coreworks.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:47:44AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Herbert Xu wrote: > >We want the same thing for km_query, no? > > In all other places were BHs are not explicitly disabled > but need to be they are already disabled by the caller, > so I left them as they are. Yes you're right. I missed the spin_lock_bh in xfrm_state_find. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Multiple REDs per Queue, Abhishek Gupta |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |