| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire() |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:43:37 +1000 |
| Cc: | Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050402115528.11f71a3c.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <E1DHdsP-0003Lr-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <424E641A.1020609@cosmosbay.com> <16974.41648.568927.54429@robur.slu.se> <20050402193224.GA25157@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050402115528.11f71a3c.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:55:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think we should, in the short term, increase the secret interval > where it exists in the tree (netfilter conntrack is another instance > for example). We could also move rt_cache_flush into a kernel thread. When the number of chains is large this function is really expensive for a softirq handler. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Get rid of rt_check_expire and rt_garbage_collect, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, Aidas Kasparas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |