| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:52:56 +0200 |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ipsec-tools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1112478168.1088.337.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <1112405144.1096.33.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050402140019.GA13017@yakov.inr.ac.ru> <1112478168.1088.337.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1112478168.1088.337.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-04-02 16:42 > Herbert also mentions something along the same lines in his email. > This would make a lot of sense! > Is the state machine going to look something along the same lines as > ARP? i.e incomplete->reachable etc? > > What would be a good code to return when you queue the packet? EINPROGRESS? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6.12-rc1-mm4] swapped memset arguments, Jesper Juhl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |