| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:12:36 +1000 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, psec-tools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1112405144.1096.33.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <1112405144.1096.33.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:25:44PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > The conclusion we reached in our discussion is: > a) -ERESTART is the correct signal to return > b) number of acquire retries should be configurable preferably a system > wide value. > > Thoughts? Once we have the xfrm resolution stuff that Patrick is working on, we can have knobs for these cases just like those in the neighbour code. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPSEC]: Kill nested read lock by deleting xfrm_init_tempsel, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux support for RDMA (was: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics), Greg KH |
| Previous by Thread: | IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |