| To: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:30:18 -0800 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Xine.LNX.4.44.0503252337500.24726-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com> |
| References: | <20050326035853.GA25162@gondor.apana.org.au> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0503252337500.24726-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:38:12 -0500 (EST) James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > In other words, we can let outbound IPCOMP always succeed. In the cases > > where it would currently fail we simply skip the IPCOMP transform. This > > makes IPCOMP slightly more resilient when memory is low and simplifies > > the code quite a bit. > > Good idea. > > Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Remove i_sock, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPSEC] Make IPCOMP more resilient, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | How to route a skb to a particular oif, when the fib_lookup suggests another one., Devesh Agrawal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |