| To: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | 31 Mar 2005 20:59:54 +0200 |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:59:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | Alex Aizman <itn780@xxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, "'netdev'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503310711430.21935@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com> |
| References: | <20050330161522.GH32111@g5.random> <20050331114122.GL24804@muc.de> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503310711430.21935@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:12:22AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > It wont work - I can guarantee you that if you add a limit like > > "we only support 8 iscsi connections max" then users/customers will raise > > hell because it does not fit their networks. > > What would prevent the iscsi driver from telling the network > stack to increase the size of the mempools when additional > iscsi connections are configured ? I was talking about the hardware limits for early filtering, not the size of the mempools. All hardware I found so far has small limits like this. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [IPV4]: Exclude "All deletion of equal addresses only differing by prefix length.", David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |