| To: | <open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics |
| From: | "Alex Aizman" <itn780@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:28:07 -0800 |
| Cc: | "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rik van Riel'" <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>, "'netdev'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050330161522.GH32111@g5.random> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcU1Q6/k56pYb/bfSK6YLXAksY3LjwAGbN0Q |
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > All I care about is to assign a mempool ID to the skb (ID > being unique identifier for the tcp connection I don't care > how the implementation is). It makes sense to provide an API for the NIC driver to allocate skb from the *right* mempool. This way if I have plenty of hw rings and/or can allow myself a luxury to associate 1-to-1 connection and ring, there's a nice and clean memory management model. Even NICs that have only few rings could use this - for critical (e.g., storage) connections. Alex |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Dmitry Yusupov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mv643xx(16/20): Limit MTU to 1500 bytes unless connected at GigE speed, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |