netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics

To: <open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics
From: "Alex Aizman" <itn780@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:28:07 -0800
Cc: "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rik van Riel'" <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>, "'netdev'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050330161522.GH32111@g5.random>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcU1Q6/k56pYb/bfSK6YLXAksY3LjwAGbN0Q
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote: 
> 
> All I care about is to assign a mempool ID to the skb (ID 
> being unique identifier for the tcp connection I don't care 
> how the implementation is). 

It makes sense to provide an API for the NIC driver to allocate skb from the
*right* mempool. This way if I have plenty of hw rings and/or can allow
myself a luxury to associate 1-to-1 connection and ring, there's a nice and
clean memory management model. Even NICs that have only few rings could use
this - for critical (e.g., storage) connections. 

Alex


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>