[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:27:17 +1000
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1112188704.1088.170.camel@jzny.localdomain>
References: <1111864971.1092.904.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111867875.1089.915.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111950449.1089.938.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1112188704.1088.170.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:18:25AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> we let the km make the call; pfkey already had these calls and i believe
> they are the ones that should go in order to be generic. Actually more
> like split into two. But thats defered for later (if it ever gets done).

Yes you're right.  I thought you were putting it into xfrm_state_insert
but that's not the case.

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>