netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver
From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:25:43 +0200
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4249B52C.2000300@pobox.com>
References: <200503290533.j2T5XEYT028850@hera.kernel.org> <4248FBFD.5000809@pobox.com> <20050328230830.5e90396f.akpm@osdl.org> <20050329071002.GA16204@havoc.gtf.org> <20050329152057.GA27840@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4249B52C.2000300@pobox.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, 29 March 2005 15:06:04 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> >
> >Just out of curiosity: why are there two mailing lists?  Especially if
> >one of them is the Wrong One.
> 
> <shrug>
> 
> linux-net is mostly dead.  I get the impression it is occasionally used 
> by users.
> 
> netdev (as, perhaps, the name implies) is where the network developers 
> hang out.

Ok, I figured as much.  But then, why is linux-net not just deleted?
Bouncing mails would be an indication that noone will read them,
right?

Jörn

-- 
There's nothing better for promoting creativity in a medium than
making an audience feel "Hmm ­ I could do better than that!"
-- Douglas Adams in a slashdot interview

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>