| To: | "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] rtnl_unlock/lock in sch_api.c TRY2 |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:29:01 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503290206500.3229@webhosting.rdsbv.ro> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503290206500.3229@webhosting.rdsbv.ro> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503290206500.3229@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-29 02:09 > + replay: > + tcm = NLMSG_DATA(n); > + tca = arg; > + clid = tcm->tcm_parent; I know this has been in dave's patch already but why is this needed? None of these variables changed in the meantime and the netlink message should still be the same. > + q = p = NULL; There is also no way for q being != NULL here but I don't mind if this stays as-is, both are supposed to be temporary variables. Despite of these two comments the patch looks ok to me. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Reducing the overhead on the network core, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Linux support for RDMA (was: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics), Roland Dreier |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] rtnl_unlock/lock in sch_api.c TRY2, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] rtnl_unlock/lock in sch_api.c TRY2, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |