| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] s390: qeth tcp segmentation offload |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:09:29 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4248FD8D.6030208@pobox.com> |
| References: | <200503290533.j2T5X0ZZ028790@hera.kernel.org> <4248FD8D.6030208@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Please help me understand: why add all this TSO code (zerocopy), if you > are adding memcpy() under the hood? > > Was this reviewed on netdev? or by any network developer? > > Overall this patch adds a whole lot of code that must be VERY intimate > with the net stack, a huge maintenance burden that is likely to be rife > with out-of-date code and bugs over time. > There was some dicussion on linux-net last Thursday. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | e1000 packet corruption problem, Michal Vanco |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |