| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: af_packet.c bug? |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:17:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4248642E.40304@candelatech.com> |
| References: | <424858D4.8060604@candelatech.com> <20050328195557.GF3086@postel.suug.ch> <4248642E.40304@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Ben Greear <4248642E.40304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 12:08 > >Seems so, please adopt the size of spkt_device in struct sockaddr_pkt > > you mean adapt maybe? Of course, stupid typo. ;-> > I was also wondering why we couldn't hold a reference to the net-device > instead of just it's ifindex when dealing with a bound raw socket. Saving a netdevice handle in the packet socket is not a problem but doing the same for the packet socket address seems to be non trivial. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Conntrack leak with raw sockets, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: af_packet.c bug?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: af_packet.c bug?, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: af_packet.c bug?, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |