| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:38:01 +0200 |
| Cc: | Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503272249040.5086@math.ut.ee> <1111972035.1091.946.camel@jzny.localdomain> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503281017060.21333@math.ut.ee> <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1112012657.1089.1013.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-28 07:24 > If we are going to make u32 an exception then this code should be > surrounded by #ifdef ..ACTION.. The same condition is needed for tcf_exts_dump and tcf_exts_dump_stats in u32, they're only apart to cut the TCA_OPTIONS nested TLV so I'm trying to find out is whether we can get rid of dump_stats alltogether and hide it. I'm working on a patch to do this, I hope to have enough time to finish it today. > My time is about to become scarce, so if you > have time please create the patch. Again, don't waste cycles on this. It was my fault and I will fix it. ;-> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |