| To: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:34:58 -0800 |
| Cc: | dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503272245350.30885@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com> |
| References: | <4241D106.8050302@cs.wisc.edu> <20050324101622S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1111628393.1548.307.camel@beastie> <20050324113312W.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1111633846.1548.318.camel@beastie> <20050324215922.GT14202@opteron.random> <424346FE.20704@cs.wisc.edu> <20050324233921.GZ14202@opteron.random> <20050325034341.GV32638@waste.org> <20050327035149.GD4053@g5.random> <20050327054831.GA15453@waste.org> <1111905181.4753.15.camel@mylaptop> <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@davemloft.net> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503272245350.30885@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:54:11 -0500 (EST) Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We shouldn't do that when we're really really low on > memory. I envision something like this: ... > (SO_MEMALLOC?) Interesting top-down scheme. We could also make a way to adjust the GFP_ATOMIC reserve thresholds too. That seems a bit more generic. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Rik van Riel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |