| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: KERNEL: assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed at net/netlink/af_netlink.c (126) |
| From: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:38:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1DFUaZ-0001Hg-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <20050327091524.GA23215@elte.hu> <E1DFUaZ-0001Hg-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > this was on a box that is DSL connected and thus gets lots of trash
> > packets over the wire. It is running -RT ontop of 2.6.12-rc1, and got
> > this message after 2 days of uptime.
>
> This assertion can only be caused by netlink applications. What
> netlink applications do you use on this machine? Examples include
> ip(8), the ULOG target of iptables, vrrpd, etc.
no vrrpd on this box. There's ipsec and wshaper on the box - both use
netlink? No ULOG target AFAIK (it's a pretty much stock FC4 install).
Ingo
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPv4 tunneled over IPv6-IPsec?, Peter Bieringer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wan/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: KERNEL: assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed at net/netlink/af_netlink.c (126), Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: KERNEL: assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed at net/netlink/af_netlink.c (126), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |