| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:24:22 +1000 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1111867505.1089.907.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <1111864971.1092.904.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050326194006.GA9737@gondor.apana.org.au> <1111867505.1089.907.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:05:05PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > > Is the intention that you'll be sending policy expire messages to > > POLEXPIRE only? > > Right. Unless you think this will break existing apps? Yes openswan listens on XFRMGRP_EXPIRE for poilcy expire messages to detect unused pass policies that were automatically generated. > Maybe i should leave EXPIRE alone? I think so. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Resend: Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | KERNEL: assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed at net/netlink/af_netlink.c (126), Ingo Molnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |