netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.x wireless update and status

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.6.x wireless update and status
From: Michael Wu <flamingice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:20:07 -0500
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Ketrenos <jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050323055243.GU8648@jm.kir.nu>
References: <4240CA69.9020902@pobox.com> <20050323055243.GU8648@jm.kir.nu>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.1
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:52 am, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > Moving forward, the next "todo" for kernel wireless hackers is to get
> > ieee80211 common code lib into shape, namely:
> > * Merge Intel ipw drivers, which use ieee80211
> > * Update HostAP to use ieee80211
> > * Merge/convert other drivers to use ieee80211?
>
> I'll be working on HostAP driver next; and ieee80211 code of course at
> the same time, since it is likely to need some changes for this. As far
> as other drivers are concerned, I'd like to see Atheros cards working
> with the generic ieee80211 code. They would be a good test target since
> they are an example of design where very large part of functionality is
> in the driver/network stack (no firmware used). This would be a good
> test to verify that the 802.11 code is generic enough for such a design.
>
The ADM8211 would be a good test too. So far, the main thing I see missing 
from the 802.11 code is software scanning/authentication/association. Is all 
of that being moved to userspace? I prefer having a little bit of that in the 
kernel so minimal managed, adhoc, and WEP features can be used without a 
daemon.

-Michael Wu

Attachment: pgpYuscw0dTsC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>