| To: | Vicente Feito <vicente.feito@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm1] net/ethernet/eth.c - eth_header |
| From: | Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:52:15 -0600 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200503231734.59277.vicente.feito@gmail.com> |
| Organization: | IBM |
| References: | <200503231734.59277.vicente.feito@gmail.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 11:34 am, Vicente Feito wrote: > Hi, > Please consider applying (or droping). > Thank you. > > Description: This patch prevent drivers from calling eth_header with a > 802.3 frame using a len>1536. In such a case returns -EINVAL, which was > hard to choose because the ETH_HLEN is supposed to return. Won't this break jumbo frames? -- Jon Mason jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm1] net/ethernet/eth.c - eth_header, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Andy Furniss |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm1] net/ethernet/eth.c - eth_header, Jon Mason |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] ipw2100 v1.1.0, James Ketrenos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |