Re: [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending

netdev

Re: [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames

To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:20:02 -0800
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050321105622.GA23809@gondor.apana.org.au>
References:	<20050321105622.GA23809@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:56:22 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The fix is similar to what we did in ip_output.  Instead of checking
> whether frag_list is empty, we check the condition skb->len <= dst_mtu
> directly and set the DF bit based on that.

Looks good, applied.

Thanks Herbert.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames, Herbert Xu [IPV4] Clear DF bit in ip_fragment fast path, Herbert Xu Re: [IPV4] Clear DF bit in ip_fragment fast path, David S. Miller Re: [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 3/3] SGI Altix cross partition functionality (2nd revision), David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [IPV4] Clear DF bit in ip_fragment fast path, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: [IPV4] Clear DF bit in ip_fragment fast path, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:	[IPSEC] Too many SADs!, Stephen Frost
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]